Various current headlines have conveyed thoughtfulness regarding allegations that the new leader of the United States is practicing nepotism. Despite the fact that not entirely groundless, this is just the same old thing when it comes to folks behind the desk at the Oval Office. Presidential nepotism is nearly as old as the presidency itself. Regardless, it is by all accounts an American tradition.
1. Donald Trump
The current president of the United States, Donald Trump, has named both his daughter and his son-in-law to influential roles in the White House. Much like the nepotism found in earlier administrations, his choice is neither remarkable nor without contention. His daughter Ivanka has been granted the unpaid position of assistant to the president. Her official post at the White House is capricious for that of a president’s daughter. In spite of the fact that her duties stay unclear, she is bound to similar ethic rules as all administrative employees.
Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, has the title of senior adviser to the president. A few specialists have contended this is a breach of 5 US Code § 3110, yet the Justice Department reasoned that Kushner’s part does not break any anti-nepotism laws. Kushner’s job is a compelling one. He is entrusted with finishing significant political deeds, extending from brokering peace in the Middle East to remodeling the whole central government. Regardless of whether this power couple will be a success in their White House employments remains to be seen. In any case, one thing is sure: Donald Trump is proceeding with the long-running US presidential custom of nepotism.
2. Zachary Taylor
Regardless of his presidency enduring not as much as 18 months, Zachary Taylor figured out how to find an opportunity to make public ire with his familial appointments. His two presidential associates were his brother, Joe, and his son-in-law, William Bliss. Joe served in as Zachary Taylor’s confidant and had an excellent impact on the president. Joe and his family were given residence in the White House whenever Congress was in session, and he had the president’s ear. Bliss married into the family not long after Zachary Taylor won the election.
He was well-spoken and composed the majority of Taylor’s dispatches. In any case, Joy’s appointment was regularly criticized in newspapers for giving him an excessive power. Both Joe Taylor and William Bliss were abode an active military duty in spite of not doing any military work. So they were both getting salaries, also, their presidential advantages.
3. Ulysses S. Grant
The presidency of Ulysses S. Grant was defaced by scandals, not the minimum of which was nepotism. Amid his time in office, he appointed and employed more than 40 of his relatives. Indeed, even after a significant portion of them were turned out to be corrupt and manhandling their power. Grant either gave them a presidential absolve for their wrongdoings or just enabled them to remain in office.
His brother-in-law had stolen from the New Orleans Customs Office and was reappointed by Grant as a collector of customs, while another brother-in-law worked at the White House and much of the time sold insider information while never being punished. Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner commented of Grant’s presidency that the nation was experiencing “a dropsical nepotism swollen to elephantiasis.” Interestingly enough, Grant’s inclination to promoting undeserving relatives begun before his presidency.
His son, Fred, was a weak student. Still, Grant got then-President Johnson to delegate Fred to West Point. Fred graduated last in his class and was infamous for harassing the first black student to attend the school. Despite the fact that Ulysses S. Grant made outstanding accomplishments regarding civil rights, it would appear to be even that deed is undermined by his nepotism and his son’s bigotry.
4. Rutherford B. Hayes
The decision of Rutherford B. Hayes was amazingly antagonistic, even by all accounts. He didn’t win the popular vote or even the majority vote of the Electoral College. But his adversary, Samuel Tilden, was as yet a single vote away from winning the lion’s share. Evidently, 20 of the appointive votes were being challenged, and Congress needed to set up an electoral commission to resolve the matter.
To make a long story short, barely in time and after furious political planning, Hayes was chosen the president of the United States. It was simply salt in the wound when Hayes proceeded with his predecessor’s legacy of nepotism by including his son, Webb, in critical government issues. Before the election, Webb had dropped out of school to fill in as secretary to his dad while he was the governor of Ohio. Webb kept on working for his father all the way to the White House. Webb filled in as both a bodyguard and as his dad’s right-hand man, taking the necessary steps of a current chief of staff.
5. Woodrow Wilson
When Woodrow Wilson designated racial oppressor William McAdoo as treasury secretary, it wasn’t too astounding as most individuals from Wilson’s office were Southern racists. Nor did many heads turn when McAdoo pushed to isolate his area of expertise while downgrading and firing many black employees. It came as a shock, however, when he wedded Wilson’s daughter just a year after his appointment.
McAdoo even offered to abdicate after the wedding, yet Wilson insisted that McAdoo continues in his position. When the U.S entered World War I in 1917, President Wilson chose to concentrate altogether on the war while leaving his essential duties to certain members of his cabinet. The part in whom Wilson endowed many presidential duties was none other than his son-in-law, William McAdoo.
6. Franklin D. Roosevelt
Indeed, even Franklin D. Roosevelt with his many achievements put his family in significant White House positions. He was a big fan of his fifth cousin, President Theodore Roosevelt, to such an extent that he wedded Teddy’s most beloved niece, Eleanor. The interfamily marriage of this sort was common at the time. Nonetheless, there is little uncertainty that Franklin chose his bride to get closer to the cousin whom he so appreciated. But exploiting family connections doesn’t add up to nepotism.
The roles of his children in the White House did, in any case, raise a couple of eyebrows. His son James turned into his secretary in 1937. James was often seen with his brother Elliot at essential World War II–era conferences. Perhaps much more influential in the president’s ear was his daughter, Anna. Despite the fact that she didn’t have an official role, she moved into the White House in 1943 and substantially served as his first lady throughout the last two years of his presidency.
Anna dealt with her father’s issues and spent most of her days with him. While we can now think back and see that his children were for the most part there to help hide Franklin Roosevelt’s polio, despite everything it presented some moral issues concerning how much power the presidential children may get. It is accurately their ambiguous roles as secretaries and colleagues that have driven a few specialists to draw a parallel amongst them and President Donald Trump’s children.
7. John F. Kennedy
It would be neglectful also John F. Kennedy’s appointment of his brother Robert to the esteemed place of an attorney general. Eventually, it is the very reason we have 5 US Code § 3110, which forbids the president of the United States from bestowing his or her relatives any position as a government employee. Robert Kennedy’s appointment was without a doubt questionable.
He was the youngest attorney general since 1814 and did not have experience in practicing law. Albeit scandalous at the time, Robert Kennedy is presently remembered as being a success in the position. He battled corruption and organized crime while at the same time championing social right. He was key in making the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He likewise had a critical impact on the handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis. With everything taken into account, Robert Kennedy is an example that occasionally nepotism isn’t such a bad thing.
8. Bill Clinton
Hillary Clinton is familiar with the difficulties of nepotism. She was blamed for benefitting from it while her husband was in the Oval Office. Bill Clinton titled her chair of a health reform task force and was legally challenged as to whether the course of action violated 5 US Code § 3110. Several legal experts trusted that Hillary’s position was the conflict of interest and that it would invalidate the anti-nepotism laws set up 25 years before if she was permitted to proceed in a role. The government appeals court ended up ruling that the statute did not have any significant bearing to White House employees, in this way setting the point of reference, for now, ‘s presidential familial involvement.
9. George W. Bush
George W. Bush’s appointments were overflowing with relatives—quite recently not his own. Many of his supporters found their relatives all of a sudden pushed into positions of power.The rundown is long: Colin Powell’s son, Michael, turned into the chairman of the FEC; Senator Strom Thurmond’s 28-year-old son was named US attorney for South Carolina; Antonin Scalia’s son, Eugene, became the chief labor attorney; Elaine Chao, is Senator Mitch McConnell’s wife; George W. Shrubbery’s Secretary of Labor, Elizabeth Cheney’s husband, became chief counsel for the Office of Management and Budget, Elizabeth Cheney, the then–vice president’s daughter, moved toward becoming deputy assistant secretary of state. The rundown goes on and on.
No one endeavored to cover up what was happening. In fact, many individuals made jokes about it. Chris and Kris Ullman both served the organization in various capacities until their daughter was born, joked, “She’s never worked in the organization.”
10. John Adams
Perhaps the originator of American nepotism, John Adams was unafraid of showing the special treatment he gave to his family members. It shouldn’t be a lot of a surprise given that he is both the second president and the father of the 6th president. Adams prepared for his son’s eventual presidency by designating him to be the minister of Prussia. But John Adams additionally gave some well-paying positions to various relatives, for example, naming his son-in-law to a few government posts and naming his brother-in-law postmaster in Quincy, Massachusetts.
His son’s father-in-law became superintendent of stamps in Washington, DC, in spite of not getting even a simple majority vote from the Senate. Many were angry with the explicit display of nepotism, and Adams was blamed for being a monarchist. It didn’t help that he wrote a few letters talking about the prerequisite for hereditary institutions in the newly formed nation. Despite the fact that there were a few reasons why he lost reelection to Jefferson, his notoriety of attempting to institute familial rule was a huge element.